Teaching Kids to Be
Dumb (I mean, to Think For Themselves)
and/or
How We Teach Kids
Peer Pressure at School
My friend Lucy came to see me the other day. Okay, I probably should refer to her as a
student named Lucy. But after I have
talked to someone for a while and no longer see her regularly because she is
doing well, I think of the person as an “old friend.” Anyway, Lucy is a senior and asked to see
me. I was a bit worried because in the
past that meant something was going on in her life and it wasn’t always
good. But in this case, Lucy just wanted
to use me as a resource for a class project.
And her project got me thinking about something I think about all the
time!
Lucy was doing a project on drug use among high school
students and the premise of her project was that there need to be better
classes on the topics of drinking and drug use and so on for high school
students because programs like DARE which are done with elementary students are
basically “useless” – her word not mine.
But I agree with the word choice and any research I have seen on the
topic has supported that elementary prevention programs are not effective in
the long term. Lucy said, “I don’t
remember anything we did in DARE (when I was in fifth grade). And it didn’t stop me or anyone else from
getting into alcohol and drugs.” I
immediately thought of a passage from my soon to be released book called
“Fool’s Gold: Searching for Goodness in the Human Heart” (Yup, this is an
unashamed advertisement!) I showed Lucy
this section which refers to “Just Say No” education that is based on a values
clarification model (“decide for yourself what you believe and choose based on
that”):
These programs are started at early grades in the
schools and the basic approach is to teach kids early that there are good
reasons not to smoke (or drink or do drugs) and no real good reasons to
smoke. The kids are taught to make a
figurative list (sometimes literal) of pros and cons of smoking. Ask any first grader who has been through
this kind of teaching and they will likely be able to give you several reasons
why smoking is bad for you and maybe one or none why someone might smoke. The one reason will be “to be cool.” But first graders don’t see other first
graders who smoke as cool. So that
reason isn’t appealing. Recognizing that
there are unique situations out there, in general there are very few first
graders who are going to smoke or drink or do drugs. Teaching them reasons why not to do those
things is pretty much meaningless. But
teaching them how to think about these issues and make their own decisions is
laying a pretty big trap for adolescence.
All through
elementary school, Julie has been taught to think for herself and to make up
her own mind. She graduated from the
DARE program in sixth grade and now has gone on to junior high school. When Julie was in elementary school, she made
a list just as she had been taught about why she was never going to start
smoking. It kind of looked like this:
SMOKING
Pros Cons
1. Some people think
it’s cool 1. You can get cancer
2. It makes your clothes smell bad
3. It costs lots of money
4. My parents will be mad at me
5. You could die
6. It’s against the law
7. My teachers will be sad
8. It makes your teeth yellow
9. It makes your breath stink
This pro/con list
made it easy for Julie to see why she would never smoke. The cons clearly outweighed the pros. Of course, Julie had little opportunity to test
her list in elementary school as she was never actually offered a cigarette by
anyone, including any of her friends.
Nor was she in any way interested in finding out what smoking was like.
But now Julie is
in junior high and things have changed a bit.
Some of her friends have started dabbling in various things they all
said they would not do when they were learning about them during Red Ribbon
Week in elementary school. Julie has
even gone to a couple of parties where some of the people she knows have been
smoking. Time to get out the list to see
if the cons still outweigh the pros.
Julie has been well taught to think for herself and not just to do what
her friends are doing. In fact, in many
cases, Julie has learned to not even do what her parents say just because they
are her parents. She knows how to
clarify her own values and she can make her own decisions; except now the list
looks like this:
SMOKING
Pros Cons
Some 1. You can get cancer
2. It makes your clothes smell bad
People 3. It costs lots of money
4. My parents will be mad at me
Think 5. You could die
6. It’s against the law
It’s 7. My teachers will be sad
8. It makes your teeth yellow
COOL!!! 9. It makes your breath stink
So now, when Julie
gets out the scale and weighs the decision out, which side weighs more? And so, like many kids who in first and
second grade swore they would never smoke (as if kids that age can make
decisions like that!), Julie now joins those with clarified values who choose
to do what they said they never would.
And it’s not even that the content has changed in the list of pros and
cons; only the relevance of the content.
If this is true
for smoking, it’s the same for drugs and sex and shoplifting and lying to
parents and other adults and cheating and all sorts of things that many of us,
left entirely to our own “goodness”, would do!
What kids learn from this kind of instruction is not useful for making
decisions that will affect their lives in a positive way (not smoking, not
doing drugs, etc.). Instead, it teaches
them a way of thinking that in many ways actually gives them permission to do
the very things we thought we were teaching them not to do! We’ve taught them to think for themselves
according their own knowledge of good and evil regardless of what their
friends, teachers, or even their parents think.
Lucy took one look at this and just like her namesake
waiting for Schroeder to play just the right version of Jingle Bells shouted,
“THAT’S IT!!” She totally got it and
said that was exactly what happened in her own life and in the lives of her
friends. Once people started doing it, whatever
“it” was, in order to fit in, logical reasons to not do it were overwhelmed by
emotional reasons to do it. But we taught the kids to think like this! “Make a list; check it twice, make up your
own mind!”
Someone says, “Sure, but that’s why we teach kids about
resisting peer pressure and we do that even more when the kids hit junior and
senior high. We tell them, ‘You
shouldn’t do something just because your friends do.’” In the category of actions speak louder than
words, I can only say, “Really?” From
the time kids enter the institutional school setting they are told in subtle
and not so subtle ways that the only sin is to be different from the kids
around them. Hear these teacher voices:
· “If you are not sure what to do, you should look at your classmates
and do what they are doing.”
· “Your friends are not going to want to play with you if you keep acting like that.”
· “I like what the blue table is doing; the other tables might want to look at the blue table and see what those students are doing.”
· “No one else in the class is out of their seat! Why are you walking around the room?”
· “Do you see anyone else doing that!?!?” (Extra punctuation means extra emotion!)
· “Your friends are not going to want to play with you if you keep acting like that.”
· “I like what the blue table is doing; the other tables might want to look at the blue table and see what those students are doing.”
· “No one else in the class is out of their seat! Why are you walking around the room?”
· “Do you see anyone else doing that!?!?” (Extra punctuation means extra emotion!)
These kinds of statements are ubiquitous in the school
setting. They are constant and they have
one constant theme: Do what your classmates (friends) do because the goal is
that everyone should be the same and the only sin is being different.
We even carry this into academic performance. The main goal of all schools right now is
that all kids score above the 40th percentile on standardized
measures of reading, math and science.
Standardized basically means there is a normal or average group of kids
and we need all kids to be in that category.
This comes from No Child Left Behind and there are many challenges to
this goal in terms of statistical realities and maybe even desirability (My
last essay called Delight in the Gap deals with some of this).
But beyond the challenges, think of the foundation on which
it is built. We need to close the gap in
terms of achievement so that there is no gap in achievement – in other words,
everyone is the same. This close the gap
thinking is applied (almost always unconsciously) to behavior as well. The school system’s goal is that everyone’s
behavior would be the same. “You need to
act like everyone else,” or more directly, “No one else is acting like
that!” I hear this from teachers I work
with who in one form or another say to me, “My class would be fine if it wasn’t
for . . . .” and the sentence is completed with the names of a student or
students who act differently than the rest of the class in terms of behavior or
achievement.
Kids are exposed to this incessant systemic voice which
says, “Act like everyone else.” And at
the same time, they are taught to think for themselves – make your list and
then make your own decision. We have
laid a foundation of thinking that can’t help but result in kids following peer
pressure as a main source of decision making.
And we are surprised! Because
after all, we adults don’t make decisions based on peer pressure! The fact that our churches and sports teams
and service organizations and hobby groups and circle of friends are made up
primarily of people who look and talk and believe just like us is not about
peer pressure – it’s just our personal preference! As I said, actions speak louder than words.
Lucy was right. We do
need a new way to address the pressures that kids face in dealing with really
dangerous choices like smoking and drugs and alcohol and sexual activity. What we are doing is not working and part of
it is the truth that our current school system teaches peer pressure as the
best way to know that one belongs. And
it teaches personal decision making based on one’s own list of pros and
cons. In my view, we need to start
thinking in absolutes, a foreign concept in our relativistic world. There are behaviors and actions that are
wrong because they are wrong, not because no one else is doing it! And there are behaviors and actions that are
wrong even if EVERYone else is doing it.
It isn’t about opinion and pros and cons and conforming to the standard
of others’ behaviors or even others’ achievement scores. It’s about doing what is right because it is
right. I’m looking forward to seeing
what Lucy comes up with from her point of view.
She’s an expert in teenage peer pressure, being a teen herself, and will
have some great insight on what might actually work!
No comments:
Post a Comment